On 27 Nov 2014, at 17:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich <drdiettri...@aol.com> wrote:
> Such statements come only from writers that do not believe that their words > can be understood in various ways ;-) I'm sorry, but I simply cannot discuss with people that, when I literally state "the result is undefined", think that I may actually have meant "the result is defined and if you change the implementation and/or keep it stable across compiler releases, then it will also conform to whatever you think that this defined behaviour should be". I don't have the energy nor the patience for that. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
