Am 07.02.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Sven Barth wrote: > >>>> So in the end a manager approach as Jonas suggested might be the best >>>> approach. Then we can for now >>>> implement the main platforms using libffi and implement full FPC ones one >>>> at a time. >>> >>> As long as we have no realiable approach to prevent people to violate the >>> libffi license, I wouldn't >>> recommend to do so. Besides this I do not want either that every FPC >>> compiled binary needs to come >>> with a libffi license text. >> >> Yes, the license might be the biggest problem here... > > Forgive me my ignorance: > Where does it say that you need to ship the license with the binary ?
https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/blob/master/LICENSE "software" means probably binary as well as source code. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
