On Sat, February 21, 2015 17:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Tomas Hajny wrote: >> On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote: >>>> Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort: >>>>> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said: >>>>>> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not >>>>>> be ignored. >>>>>> >>>>>> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer >>>>>> from outside, can he get commit access for it? >>>>> >>>>> My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted >>>>> to >>>>> that. >>>> >>>> Hmmm, I thought I did. At least I think for now that we should keep it >>>> separate and see how things evolve. fpcbuild is for now a too strong >>>> commitment imo. >>> >>> Indeed. As I proposed: a separate SVN repo is not a problem. >> >> May I remind fpcprojects again? ;-) > > You may, but the disadvantage is: > a) the revision is shared between projects. > b) user rights management is a trifle more difficult.
Alright, understood. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
