On 10.10.2015 16:58, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The class does not need to have a default property to begin with, so it is somewhere logical.
Yes, in that case a default enumerator would not be allowed, which sounds (in contrary) logical to me: no default array property => no enumerator. But this depends on the point of view, I can understand that the meanings differ. And it is a pure off-topic because it has already been decided :)

Ondrej
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to