On 10/12/2015 03:33 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:11 PM, <wkitt...@windstream.net
<mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>> wrote:
On 10/12/2015 02:02 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
The next step would probably be controlled "break", where a user would
be able
to specify how many nested loops needed to broken from.
ROTFLMAO! if you need or desire something like that then set a breakcounter
and break... in the next outer block, check breakcounter to see if you need
to break again... if so, dec(breakcounter) and break... then check it again
in the next outer block... and so on and so on until breakcounter=0... why
should the compiler have to do your logic work for you? ;)
How would you know if a nested loop finished properly or broke out? ...Just
imagine yourself a 4 nested for loops and you need to break out from the 4th to
the 1st?
by checking the value that caused the break ;) deity knows i've done it many
times before back in the TP/BP 6&7 days... i did it exactly as described, too...
we had to do it that way as there is/was no other way to do it ;)
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
