On 10/12/2015 03:43 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
Actually the above does not represent what the actual feature request is about
The "else" is to be executed, after the while (even if the while looped ZERO
times).
But it is to be skipped if the while exited via break (and only then).
For that reason "else" or "otherwise" are badly chosen keywords. Because they
imply a different function.
exactly my and others' points... "and" would be better but then one might just
as easily use a goto to jump around that part if break was used to get out of
the loop...
anyway, it seems that no matter what the discussion, it won't make it into the
compiler... that according to another post from a compiler dev ;)
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
