Am 08.06.2016 20:41 schrieb "Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis" < [email protected]>: > > Στις 2016-05-30 15:43, Sven Barth έγραψε: >> >> Am 30.05.2016 14:07 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" >> <[email protected]>: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 30 May 2016, [email protected] wrote: >> > >> >> New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1. >> > >> > >> > And the implementation is contested, which is the reason why it >> doesn't get >> > merged to trunk. >> >> It's less the binary/RTTI format (which is what the branch provides), >> but more the Invoke() implementation that would follow... > > > I know that I'm probably late, but ... > > Sven, > > currently fpc is ahead of Delphi in Linux platform but this will probably change ( if this time, they keep their Road Map that is) . > > Plz, think again regarding the proposition at http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26774#c91291 . Make it a switch or a directive during fpc build or what ever, just don't let time passes by.
Since I've now merged the critical RTTI related changes from my packages branch I'll take a look at it, play with it a bit and maybe also implement a new target (m68k or Power for example to test big endian support). If there are no apparent problems I'll merge it if no other core dev objects. @Steve: would you please change your usages of PTypeInfo to PPTypeInfo in typinfo (after you've catched up with trunk again)? Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
