2016-11-21 2:54 GMT+01:00 Paul Ishenin <paul.ishe...@gmail.com>: > Use fpc_Copy for Clone and fpc_Addref for Copy is misleading.
First of all I don't like to have Florian in opposition to this feature ;) it is a teamwork. Anyway I agree that this is misleading... But as was suggested by Florian (as far as I understand): On the language level Clone and Copy is totally new feature. Users don't have direct access to FPC_COPY nor FPC_ADDREF. FPC_COPY and FPC_ADDREF naming is outdated and probably renaming to FPC_CLONE and FPC_COPY is good idea, but old convention is still in usage for backward compatibility with old code (for "alias"/"public name" feature). I can't do much in this matter. -- Best regards, Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
