On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: > However, it should probably not be merged to fixes, because it may be a > breaking change for older Sparc/Linux versions (see my previous e-mail; > note that the situation with MIPS was probably different, because the > support of that CPU is much newer).
I am pretty sure that the "-32" option hasn't changed for aeons, so there is nothing to break here. And, as I mentioned before, you are already passing "-b elf32-sparc -m elf32_sparc" to ld, so adding "-32" to the assembler would not hurt at all. I can even ask one of Oracle's toolchain SPARC team members to confirm my assessment. In fact, I will just do this now. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
