In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said: > > merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next > > week or even monday if there is not much response. > > > > If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days > > time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix. > > I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things > improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that > it's used a lot, though. > > At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now. > > What do you think?
We could have take the risk just after a release, so we had some months for problems to emerge. Last minute merge of 118 revs that are not regularly tested in trunk is a bit minor. Moreover fpmkunit is heavily used due to fpmake, and merging is a pain, since support for newer targets that don't exist in fixes might need manual adjusting. So I would guess try to name hotfixes only. That is a bit unfair, since I do merge fcl-passrc atm, but that package is currently quite used heavily in trunk, and I kept up with merging every 2 months or so without reported problems. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
