In our previous episode, Martok said: > There is a fundamental difference in the type system between a somewhat > sensible > (if unexpected) assumption in FPC and a more practical documented definition > in > every other Pascal compiler. An assumption that even FPC follows only in this > one single spot. > This is unexpected and breaks unrelated code. That's the problem.
Other pascal's don't have sparse enums ? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel