In our previous episode, Martok said:
> There is a fundamental difference in the type system between a somewhat 
> sensible
> (if unexpected) assumption in FPC and a more practical documented definition 
> in
> every other Pascal compiler. An assumption that even FPC follows only in this
> one single spot.
> This is unexpected and breaks unrelated code. That's the problem.

Other pascal's don't have sparse enums ?
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to