2017-09-01 18:30 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel < fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>:
> I'd prefer to keep that syntax for aspects or as alternative attribute > syntax instead of wasting it for helpers that are defined to work based on > the type > +1 :))) so we have nice topic to talk. I have hope that you remember our last long conversation about default field? Since that time I've done work around aspects and smart pointers / nullable types too (and syntax with "with" is also related and can aspects can coexist with my proposition for helpers - anyway we will discuss this later in other topic). All syntax/conceptual problems mentioned last time by Jonas for default field are solved. But I don't want to start yet another discussion around new patch, especially that FastRTTI is in last phase ;) (I hope so). -- Best regards, Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel