On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos <m...@delfire.net> wrote: > Instead, I prefer using fully qualified names and just adjust in some > contexts that *there is* already a conflict name. > In other words, `uses foo as bar;` will be use per unit. It is not to > intent "renaming" a unit name for all project as Delphi namespaces > approach uses.
The Delphi namespaces approach is a good feature to reduce the redundancy of unit names. For example, if my company name is Acme and the project name is SysAbc, why do I need to type the same prefix in all units? It's redundant. So, I can set a NS as "Acme.SysAbc" for my units, but I will continue use the fully qualified names for 3rd units. Best regards, Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
