Am 27.06.2018 um 13:02 schrieb Maciej Izak:
2018-06-22 21:08 GMT+02:00 Maciej Izak <hnb.c...@gmail.com
<mailto:hnb.c...@gmail.com>>:
I see 4 options:
1. integration of FastRTTI
2. limited integration, only part of "FastRTTI" branch (only table
with initialization operators and related compiler and RTL part)
3. moving "Flags: TRecordInfoInitFlags;" into private section of
record in TypInfo module, it can be removed in the future (if
needed) without breaking backward compatibility for users code
4. all will stay as-is (the worst scenario)
The option 2 seems optimal (no redundant/useless actions/calls in
constructors).
Ping? Would be good to know what you decide.
Sorry that it took me so long, but I wanted to reread your proposed
FastRTTI changes before deciding and I only found the time this evening.
I'm currently indeed leaning towards option 2.
If you want to prepare this you can of course do it in a way that allows
to easily add in your other FastRTTI changes at a later date (though
those are still a bit up for debate (lessthe principal idea, more the
concrete implementation)).
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
