2018-06-30 8:55 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
[email protected]>:

> No, the bad taste is too have a class that appears to be named
> specifically to fit a specific third party project inside a general purpose
> library.
>

Ok, I agree here, but why Michael Van Canneyt decide to annihilating only
TmORMotHashFactory and TDelphi*HashFactory still exist? This is highly not
consequent!


> (though I agree that the change of the default hash could have been
> discussed first)
>

seems that compilation for minor example (easy fixable in other way) has
bigger priority than major performance of whole library :P

-- 
Best regards,
Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to