Am 27.10.2018 um 19:19 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > >> If you read the whole thread, LLVM needs a rewritten exception handling as >> well. Further, a quick test >> of table based exception handling on bansi1 (which is mainly a memory >> manager test) gives: >> >> standard exception handling: >> >> fpctrunk\tests\bench>pp11 bansi1 -O3 >> >> fpctrunk\tests\bench>bansi1 >> Test 1: 1000000 done in 0.537 sec >> Test 2: 1000000 done in 0.535 sec >> Test 3: 1000000 done in 0.587 sec >> >> SEH based exception handling: >> >> fpctrunk\tests\bench>pp11 bansi1 -O3 >> >> fpctrunk\tests\bench>bansi1 >> Test 1: 1000000 done in 0.456 sec >> Test 2: 1000000 done in 0.457 sec >> Test 3: 1000000 done in 0.446 sec > > Florian, I am not sure what this is supposed to prove ?
That it is useful to work on table based exception handling for all targets ... > > It's 15% off the elapsed time (almost 1/6th), that seems worth spending some > time on... _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
