A regression like this is quite serious. I'd recommend opening a bug report with a reproducible case so we can investigate and hopefully fix it within the day. At the moment I'm experimenting with increasing the speed of the optimizer for x86_64, and then porting to i386 when it's proven successful. Having teething problems though!
Gareth On Tue 04/12/18 01:16 , Simon Kissel simon.kis...@nerdherrschaft.com sent: Hi Florian, we are currently to try to do some real-life benchmarks with our products, however with rev. 40346 compilation fails with the two following showstoppers: 1.) The assembler parser appears to be broken - the following very valid opcodes get rejected: SBMath.pas(1932,9) Error: Asm: [cmp imm32,imm8s] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1934,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1939,9) Error: Asm: [cmp imm32,imm8s] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1941,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1946,9) Error: Asm: [cmp imm32,imm8s] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1948,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1953,3) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1954,3) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1955,3) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1972,3) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1976,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1981,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands SBMath.pas(1982,5) Error: Asm: [lea reg32,imm32] invalid combination of opcode and operands (-Tlinux -XPi386-linux- -CpPENTIUMM -O2 -OoCSE -CfSSE2 -Ooorderfields) 2.) On ARM, I get Internal error 200603253 at various places: SBMath.pas(1989,1) Fatal: Internal error 200603253 (sadly the line numbers are complete off for unknown reasons, so I can not find the actual source line causing this) But also happens at various other places. Most easy to reproduce by compiling PasZLib-SG (e.g. https://github.com/Soldat/PasZlib-SG [1]). Any clues? BR, Simon _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org [2] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel [3]">http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel Links: ------ [1] https://github.com/Soldat/PasZlib-SG [2] mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org [3] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
