Am 18.03.2019 um 02:57 schrieb Ben Grasset: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:57 PM Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org > <mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>> wrote: > > > How is it better than intrinsics support (similiar to gcc/icc etc.)? > > > Well, it wouldn't be better than a literal equivalent to those intriniscs, if > that's what we're talking about. By which > I mean, like, say how in Clang/GCC (or languages such as Rust that use LLVM), > if you do _mm_loadl_pd or whatever, that > translates not to a function call but directly to the "inlined" assembler > instructions (at least in release builds.)
Yes, that's what I mean. So far I have not seen a single advantage of inlining pure assembler routines over such intrinsics. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
