Normally, you have a committee of people working on such things,
and on top you have a backlog which will probably take the rest of
your life to catch up with.
But hey, it's your time, don't let me stop you...
Michael.
Well, I'm going to be living those years anyway, and despite some
occasional disagreements, I do enjoy developing for FPC!
Having a specification that the majority agrees upon would help in
ensuring programmers don't fall foul of some of the nuances of the
language, and having a committee for it stops absolute stinkers of
features like the inlined var definitions in the most recent version of
Delphi (yuck!). Also, if I suddenly die from getting struck by a
meteorite or something, at least most of the specifics of *pure*
functions will be defined so someone can pick up where I left off if
they feel up to it.
Gareth aka. Kit
P.S. I think your return e-mail got a little screwed up in the last message.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
