On 07/06/2019 21:06, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:35 PM Jonas Maebe <jo...@freepascal.org
<mailto:jo...@freepascal.org>> wrote:
Your "^Type" inline type definition would behave exactly the same
as a regular pointer type definition.
Of course. It would be strange if it didn't, I think. That's the whole
point.
My point is that a parameter type declaration is a completely different
beast than a type definition. So if you add something in it that is in
fact the same as a regular type definition, something is wrong.
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel