On 07/06/2019 21:06, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:35 PM Jonas Maebe <jo...@freepascal.org <mailto:jo...@freepascal.org>> wrote:

    Your "^Type" inline type definition would behave  exactly the same
    as a regular pointer type definition.

 Of course. It would be strange if it didn't, I think. That's the whole point.

My point is that a parameter type declaration is a completely different beast than a type definition. So if you add something in it that is in fact the same as a regular type definition, something is wrong.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to