J. Gareth Moreton <gar...@moreton-family.com> schrieb am Sa., 19. Okt. 2019, 03:52:
> Hi everyone, > > So I've run into a slight annoyance while developing support for pure > functions. The compiler will need new parser messages because of > situations such as specifying the 'pure' directive when something in > said function makes it not eligible (a warning). However, whenever a new > error such as "parser_e_enumeration_out_of_range" is included, it > ultimately causes a conflict in my branch and I have to shift all my > numbers forward one. Not a problem, just a little annoying, and I worry > that when the patch is finally ready, it might take a while to be > reviewed and, during that time, a new message is added and causes > another clash. Is there a policy on reserving a set of numbers for my > work so I can rest assured they won't be overwritten? (I've made all of > the messages that I *think* I will need). > No, there is not. Those simply have to be adjusted when a feature is merged. It's not as if those are really complicated to integrate and the msgidx and msgtxt files are generated, not merged anyway. Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
