J. Gareth Moreton <gar...@moreton-family.com> schrieb am Fr., 1. Nov. 2019, 12:56:
> So the tests all passed on i386-win32 and x86_64-win64, so that's s a > good sign. I can't submit the patches for evaluation yet because I > haven't finished the design spec yet, and also because of a minor bug > that deals with collapsing label clusters: > > .p2align 4,,10 > .p2align 3 > .Lj370: > .Lj367: > .Lj364: > .Lj361: > .Lj358: > .Lj355: > .Lj352: > .Lj349: > .Lj346: > .Lj343: > .Lj340: > > In this segment, everything is stripped except for the last label, which > is fine as all the references are changed too. Unfortunately, the > alignment fields are removed too, which shouldn't happen. It doesn't > produce incorrect code, but it may incur a performance penalty, so > shouldn't be removed - I'm just trying to figure out why that's happening! > Considering that you said that this feature is essentially cross platform: on some other platform the alignments might be important beside performance (e.g. a branch inside a branch delay slot or something like that). So, yeah, that should be fixed... Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
