Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org> schrieb am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019, 20:45:
> Am 09.11.19 um 20:26 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > > > >> Am 09.11.19 um 20:02 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > >>> > >>>>> What matters is we have the tests. > >>>> > >>>> Yes. But I see no point in having the rtl tests cluttered to > >>>> different locations. > >>> > >>> Exactly. > >>> > >>> My solution is WAY superior to yours in this respect. > >>> > >>> I have exactly 1 application which I open in lazarus. I can navigate > >>> between all the 100ds of tests without problem. > >>> > >>> Compile, run, ready. It's a matter of seconds. > >> > >> Yes, if you ignore that you need to handle different compilers/targets > >> (installed/trunk/fixes/cross compilers/remote testing). > > > > I would ignore this in each case. I compile & test for the platform I > > work on. > > > > The rest would be for the daily testsuite run. That is why it exists. > > This is way too late. This would result in a continuously broken > compiler/rtl. > But if they're used for the daily run they'd also be used for the ones run manually? I mean I did of after all for the Rtti unit tests as well... Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
