Am 07.12.2019 um 10:28 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
If there is a consensus that this is a blocker, I am ready to do the
work ASAP. provided we select the syntax. Personally, I am inclined
towards these three:
type M = procedure (const N: Integer) with var;
type M = procedure (const N: Integer) cblock;
type M = reference to procedure (const N: Integer) c;
I would prefer type M = reference to procedure (const N: Integer) cblock;
It's weird that unlike with plain procvar type declarations, there's
no semicolon between the end of the signature and the calling
convention modifier though. Or is that merely a Delphi syntax thing?
I just tested in Delphi: it chokes on the semicolon for reference
variables, but allows it for normal proc-/methodvars... *sigh*
I'd say we should allow the semicolon as well so that it is more common
with proc- and methodvars (would probably be easier anyway, cause it
could then use the normal parse_proc_directives or more importantly
procvar_dec as I suggested in the other mail).
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
