> I think Gareth meant the address of V instead (Pointer(@V)). > > Regards, > Sven
Hm. I have no idea why anyone would take pointer to pointer :) BTW, Sven, what's your opinion on dynamic arrays alignment problem? I don't have any viable solution besides maintaining my own compiler fork so far. LLVM backend could also help with autovectorization, but it would require proper alignment as well. -- Regards, Denis Golovan _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
