On 25.05.24 10:30, Peter via fpc-devel wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering: would it make sense to split the release schedule of
the compiler and the included packages?
Compiler releases are not frequent (latest is May 2021). In the
meantime, useful functionality, bug fixes and improvements have been
added to the packages. To use these added and updated packages, AFAIK,
there are two possibilities:
1. Use the trunk compiler (eg using fpcupdeluxe). Not recommended for
production environments.
2. Use a stable compiler, manually download updated packages to a
different location and make sure the compiler uses the updated
packages instead of the ones included with the compiler distribution
(bit of a hassle).
I think it would be very useful to have more frequent (stable) package
releases, while the compiler itself can stick to the current frequency
of (thoroughly tested) releases.
Having extra release burden on packages won't improve the situation.
Main issue is simply that preparing a release is a lot of boring work
and this does not change with the compiler excluded. If it was easy
work, releases could be build more often. By excluding the compiler, not
much of https://wiki.freepascal.org/Release_3.2.4 could be removed.
If I miss a smart way to use updated packages with a stable compiler,
please let me know. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel