Op 20-3-2025 om 20:46 schreef Martin Frb via fpc-devel:
So why does the compiler interpret NoStackFrame in the type declaration, when it does not do that for other non-relevant modifiers (like assembler)?
I think it is because nostackframe is a directive for the declaration of the function itself, to tell the stackframe generating code to skip the stackframe. That is also why it is linked to assembler; directive, since with assembler the compiler can't auto determine to generate a stack frame.
It has no relevance to the calling code, so it has no business in a procedural type declaration.
Maybe take a step back and try to describe what you want to achieve. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
