Am 25.08.2026 um 09:21 schrieb Martin Frb via fpc-devel:
*** But the question is: Could the compiler just write that class on the top level? ***

No, it makes no logical sense to put a type, that is *logically* a child of a routine be part of the top level. Also it may contain references to types that are local to the surrounding routine.

Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to