Paul Breneman wrote:
On 03/15/2015 05:44 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
NOBODY I
know has ever considered going back to SubVersion after using Git.
Good to know that upper case NOBODY includes me :)
Here is a simple introduction to git (as well as Linux, Python, Vim):
http://levinux.com
I'd like to do something similar for FPC & Lazarus (as mentioned before
in these forums).
It is sad to see the tone of these Git vs SubVersion messages...
Let's put it this way: I don't think that anybody is advocating
Subversion in a way that would raise eyebrows if a potential employer
came across this thread via Google.
My position is that I'd tolerate almost anything- cvs, rcs- provided
that the political and contractual terms were acceptable. I suppose that
for small and slow-moving projects a hybrid approach would be possible:
apply patches to a local VCS, and then dump that to an ISP's HTTP or FTP
server nightly.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-other