> Micha Nelissen schreef:
> >
> > Smaller than FPC ? That shouldn't differ too much, I think.
> >
> > I don't really see why ability to compile with Delphi is so big an
> > advantage ("distinct") ?
> >
>
> It can see the advantages and they should not be diminished:
> - having different compilers to confirm or exclude a compiler bug.
> - The cycle, code, compile, run, debug, code is quicker on Delphi, (if you
> are on
> windows)
> - I haven't used Delphi lately, but I think the debugger is better than what
> Lazarus
> offers. For example stepping through Lazarus code is slow, if the Call Stack
> view is
> opened, because the Lazarus listview doesn't implement BeginUpdate and
> EndUpdate
> optimally.
I don't see why the IDE should delphi compilable for that. It's about the
applications!?!?
(of course, that is indeed a problem with lazarus. the dfm<->lfm and src
conversions should get more bidirectional and reliable for that to work)
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
