>> These are pretty big when taken together.
>
>> ... ... An optional downloadable package
>> would probably make more sense though.
>
> Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries
> would be better. I am not experienced with many things, so this was pretty
> confusing ("can't find -lc" --- maybe I'd decipher libc, but "-"...).The compiler can also generate code for e.g. FreeBSD,Darwin and Linux. Should we also deliver all FreeBSD,Darwin and Linux libs? >> > 4. -pg is a compiler option, not some external feature >> > implying installation of something >> There is no other way than to have it as a compiler option, since the >> compiler must generate special code for it. Similarly, -gv implies >> that you will use Valgrind, but that does not mean we're going to >> ship Valgrind with the compiler. > > No way! I can compile with "-gv", I don't have valgrind, compiler/linker > do not complain. But debugging your application with gdb doesn't work very well > 1. Well, I don't know whether it's really ".exe" with valgrind support, > because I had issues [and reported them], for example, with external > assemblers: compile successful, application [otherwise working] > immediately fails.) > > 2. I have already reported: "-gd" causes access violation by compiler > (still in 2.0.3 2006.4.20). Fixed. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
