Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Oh, I forgot to mention.  If the ObjectStates match, the test passes
fine, and doesn't give an access violation.

While creating the new AssertEquals method, I purposefully created a
failure with then gives the access violation, instead to the
comparison message I expected:
 "Failing on 1: Expected <posClean> but got <posEmpty>"


Try creating a back trace, maybe that gives some insight.

Vincent
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to