On 18 jun 2007, at 19:48, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Is it our fault that we call CheckSynchronize nested (i.e. indirectly from a synchronized method) or is a CheckSynchronize not smart enough not to call the synchronized method (i.e MyMessage) twice, even if Synchronize is called only once for this method. If the latter
It is the latter. Nested CheckSynchronize calls are currently unsupported.
Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
