Jonas Maebe schrieb: > > On 28 Aug 2009, at 10:35, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > >> If you have a better for unix this will be fine. IIRC it is not easy (if >> possible after all?) to implement TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer >> for unix systems. > > What's wrong with these routines: pthread_rwlock_init, > pthread_rwlock_rdlock/pthread_rwlock_wrlock, pthread_rwlock_unlock, > pthread_rwlock_destroy?
I simply don't know but I thought there was a reason it could have been also something like kylix compatibility. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
