Op 2010-07-26 11:34, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf: > > Well, I fail to see what is more logical in my.constants than in myconstants. > The unit is still called my.constants, not constants. So you'll end up > typing my.constants everywhere anyway. The gain of this over myconstants is > highly debatable. > > Since (as jonas points out) it introduces an ambiguity and violates the rule > that a unit name must be a pascal identifier, the pros must be weighed > against > the contras. The contras are known.
You are confusing the point. (excuse the pun) :) My preferred namespaces implementation is *not* the dotted unit names like Delphi currently have. My preferred method (see my other message thread) would be a 'namespace' keyword and a new -namepace= compiler parameter. Unit names will stay the same as the currently are - a legal identifier without the use of extra dots in the unit name. In my opinion, this is a much better idea than what Delphi implemented. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
