In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said: > > Categorizing routines, with subcategs if need be will be trouble enough, > > specially if you want to do it future proof (and also be able to flag the > > static > > method approach that Delphi current favours) > > OK, that was totally chinese. I'll have to ask my chinese pillow to > translate this.
I mean procedures and functions is not enough. It must be possible to add static methods to this categorization system too (to be visible in the same overviews as normal functions), because newer delphi versions stuff all new routines as static methods into classes, and sooner or later we will have to deal with that too. With subcateg(ory)s I meant that simply one dimensional tagging might not be enough. You might want to have a broad category with several smaller ones nested in it. I hope you and your chinese pillow will be allright :-) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
