Em 21/02/2012, às 18:35, Martin escreveu: > On 21/02/2012 20:28, Everton Vieira wrote: >> Em 21/02/2012, às 14:20, Martin escreveu: >> >>> On 21/02/2012 16:14, leledumbo wrote: >>>>> So the savest way to ensure that BackTraceStrFunc returns more than just >>>> the address us to use "-gl" >>>> >>>> I think I'm not clear enough to say that I have used -gl for this, and I >>>> don't get the line information. I've tried this on 2 places: ExceptProc and >>>> TApplication.OnException. >>>> >>> It should be noted, that afaik if the BackTraceStrFunc encounters an error, >>> it is reset to the system one (without line info). So once backtrace failed >>> (maybe problems reading a particular part of the debug info, it switches >>> itself off... (for all further calls) >>> >>> If you don't get results: then you should mention if that was using stabs, >>> or dwarf. And 32bit 64 bit. >> Did you have looked at the example i send? It also is not working. I`m on >> 32b mac osx lion with svn version instaled. And with none of the available >> options have worked: automatic, stabs, dwarf, dwarf2, dwarf3 beta. >> > Well then maybe there is a bug on Mac. > > It does work for me on windows (and IIRC I also had success on Linux) both 32 > bit.
I have a virtualized windows xp here. I`ll try there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
