That was the seventh message on a subject which is not related to FPC in any recognizable way. Although not a very frequent poster, I still need to be on this list because I chose FPC for some of my professional work, and I usually learn a lot from following some of the discussions on the list. Why does this type of discussion not go on fpc-other?
I know I'm not a moderator or anything. I am just very busy and really just beg you to respect my decision to be on the "fpc-pascal" list and not "visions-other". Thanks, R. On 2/26/2012 12:35 PM, ik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 13:25, zeljko <zel...@holobit.net> wrote: >> and that tables can contain billion of rows ... so visualisation won't be so >> snappy :) > > It depends on your tests. That visualization is for test driven > development (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development). > > In Ruby I use Cucumber for such things, and then you can provide also > a table with possible values to see how it will react. > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
