On 17-4-2012 13:33, LacaK wrote:
> 
>>
>> Does it perhaps follow ODBC conventions or something?
>>   
> or SQL-Standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA views ;-)
While I know that standard exists - I can tell without looking it up
that the integer table_type column we're using is a vendor specific
extra - that's how good my crystal ball is.
Of course, sometimes the ball is wrong and I get the blame ;)

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to