On 17-4-2012 13:33, LacaK wrote: > >> >> Does it perhaps follow ODBC conventions or something? >> > or SQL-Standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA views ;-) While I know that standard exists - I can tell without looking it up that the integer table_type column we're using is a vendor specific extra - that's how good my crystal ball is. Of course, sometimes the ball is wrong and I get the blame ;)
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal