Am 2012-08-30 18:29, schrieb Ralf A. Quint:
> Pascal has evolved since Wirth's original design back in the 70s

This is true. But there are two aspects of the Pascal extensions of the last years 
(decades) that contradict with what I would call the "spirit of Pascal":

1.) Many "extensions" add to the learning curve of newbies (where will Pascal be in 10 or 
20 years and how long does it take a pupil to learn it?). Adding extensions over and over again 
without much thinking will ruin the language some day because nobody will try this bloated software 
anymore. I have programmed with Turbo Pascal quite a lot in the 80s and 90s but when I read about 
the "recently" added concepts I don't understand a word (and I also never missed them!). 
It seems that these extensions cannot even be easily explained because the concepts are very 
obscure and require sophisticated knowledge about the compiler to understand them. Extensions in 
the past were very easy to understand and to handle.

2.) Many "extensions" come from other languages and break fundamental (Pascal) 
laws (as I would call them). For example, to me an identifier *has* to mean the same in 
all contexts of a program (whether declaration, function parameter, part of an 
expression, ..). Dynamic arrays violate this by meaning the address of a pointer or the 
address of the first array element depending on whether they are dereferenced or not. 
Pointers should be shown as pointers and not obscured. This leads to a very lot of 
misunderstandings. Borland should have looked for a cleaner solution for such dynamic 
arrays IMO. But now the sin has been commited and cannot be withdrawn. Nevertheless, no 
new sins should be added anymore.

The result is that Pascal is no longer that clear and easy to learn (yet 
powerful) language that it was. Of course, you can still ignore all the 
extensions that have been added but you cannot understand foreign code anymore 
(which is often necessary to understand what happens in the compiler or 
libraries when using them).
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to