In our previous episode, Vincent Snijders said: > > I thought about the 2.6.0<->2.6.2 transition, but it is easy to temporarily > > wrap another version check around it for a few weeks. More work, but not a > > problem. (just needs documentation in rel_eng) > > Alternatively, it could just be a warning. Then if it fails later, the > complete output will show the reason.
True, but I think that will only resolve something in such a low number of cases that it is makes the whole effort negiable. IOW that defeats the purpose of the check IMHO. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
