Lazarus & Freepascal work fine & native on both windows / mac, with
retina display lazarus actually looks very good when you use a current
snapshot.
mikropascal is windows only, when you only plan to use ARM then
programming also works fine in a Parallels VM, when you plan to also
target PIC/PIC32 you need a real windows computer because their
pic-programmer does not work correctly atm in a Parallels VM.
Michael
Am 15.03.13 10:40, schrieb Roberto P.:
2013/3/15 Rainer Stratmann <rainerstratm...@t-online.de
<mailto:rainerstratm...@t-online.de>>
> Can you make a comparison against FPC target-embedded ?
FPC target-embedded is very complicated to install (Linux development
computer).
I'm on Win32 (or Win32 on Parallels on Max OS X); I'll have to dig
more to understand what is needed.
For 32 bit ARM I would try to use freepascal.
I got it work somehow.
any tip or guide would be appreciated, then.
> I'm just a little afraid of the potentially limited maturity of
these.
What do you mean exactly with that?
I mean that (maybe) both FPC and mikroePascal are young products for
the embedded world, so that I might be facing compiler or library
propblems during the devlopment, besides my own project problems.
Am Friday 15 March 2013 07:48:25 schrieb Michael Ring:
> I also like their products, especially the development boards
are very
> well designed. The IDE+debugger is nice & complete and the
support fo
> the software is also very good.
Yes, they are busy with that stuff. And have a relatively good
marketing
(important to earn money).
That's a +1
Roberto
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
