In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: > Hitting all kinds of interesting errors, trying various combinations of > manually building + running the commands fpcup generates to find out > what's going wrong. > > c:\development\fpctrunk\bin has trunk FPC binaries. > > 1. Is this supposed to happen? > Could perhaps be the PATH containing ( or ) (which indeed is the case on > my 64 bit system - sorry, tends to happen with c:\program files (x86) > http://okolovich.info/interruptexception-caught-with-code-0xc00000fd/ > and reported, but closed as reporter did not give feedback: > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17084
Strangely enough my experiences are the other way around (generally the FPC make is stable, and have occasional exceptions when I accidentally use the cygwin make). Do you use the fpc 2.6.2 make, or the one from fpcbuild. Afaik that one was updated by Florian since 2.6.2? I have (x86) directories in the path too, and don't get exceptions > 2. Should FPC upgrade to a newer make.exe (e.g. 3.81+ as suggested in > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17084)? I don't think it is necessarily older or newer, but more finding a version that is stable. Probably depends on what hand fixing and configure tricks they used to build under Windows. > 3. Any "approved" location where I should get an updated make.exe for to > test myself meanwhile? mingw site? _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
