On 07/29/2015 04:47 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
I see you're using two concepts of synchronization (semaphore and
events) at the same time.
Maybe better to separate them?
It is not clear why use events to limit thread access to service.
There are several implementation details a semaphore can have
- counting / not counting
- if taken by a precess/thread will the same process/thread
block/count when it tries a second take ?
- if taken by a precess/thread is a different process/thread allowed
to free it ?
- ...
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
