On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Tue, 02 Feb 2016: > >>On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Henry Vermaak wrote: > >>>On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:24:57AM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt > >>>wrote: > >>>>On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Henry Vermaak wrote: > >>>Pascal is not a language full of programmer traps, let's try not to > >>>add any! > >> > >>Well, see my reply about 'robust' code for an observation about > >>these details. > > > >You only talked about the order of evaluation in that mail, while > >Henry is talking about whether the arguments are evaluated at all. > > I am aware of that (I knew I should have mentioned it explicitly, this > is a programmers list!), but the exact same observation applies.
So you are saying that relying on all function arguments being evaluated is bad? Henry _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
