Am 15.04.2016 13:58 schrieb "Ryan Joseph" <r...@thealchemistguild.com>: > > > > On Apr 15, 2016, at 5:13 PM, Tony Whyman <tony.why...@mccallumwhyman.com> wrote: > > > > unit unitA; > > > > interface > > > > type > > > > class TClassA > > private > > FClassBObject: TObject; > > public > > procedure SomeProc; > > end; > > > > implementation > > > > uses unitB; > > > > procedure TClassA.SomeProc; > > var aClassBObject: TClassB absolute FClassBObject; > > begin > > aClassBObject.OtherProc; > > end; > > > > end. > > I see now. That’s possibly preferable so I’ll keep it in mind but like you said just sucking it up and type casting is not so bad. :) Sure enough but it would even better if the compiler was more friendly here. If there was a good pre parser in FPC I’d just make some custom syntax but that’s not an option either as far as I know.
Again, you're fighting against design principles of the language. It's just as if you'd want to have virtual class methods in C++... Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
