On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Andrey M, Zubarev wrote:
Hi All,
Why can't use procedural type for declare a procedure\function?
Why ever allow the exact same signature? It's uncomfortable
Maybe it makes sense to introduce into the language such a possibility?
For example such code:
[code]
type TMyCommand=function(arg1:TMyArg):TMyCommandResult
begin
...
end;
command1 TMyCommand;
begin
...
end;
You can do this already using a macro
{$define mysig:=(arg1:TMyArg):TMyCommandResult}
type TMyCommand = function mysig;
function command1 mysig;
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
