> On Sep 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> > wrote: > > Either way, modifying the example to use a getter method AND > TAggregatedObject, I managed to get rid of both memory leaks. Here is the > working [memory leak free] code now:
Does the original code work if you just add the Free() call? I would expect it to leak without that. Regards, Ryan Joseph _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal