Op 2018-12-08 om 22:03 schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
I don't see where the bitwise should be involved here. There is no
integer.
The docs do not mention a different precedence lvl for logical/bitwise
"and".
My line of thought was the docs might mean bitwise there.
Because to the best of my knowledge, here isn't any difference in
precedence, so there is nothing to explain.
And that was what my post was, checking that.
I'm more of the "more parenthesis never hurt anybody" school, so
operator precedence beyond the normal mathematical is not my strong point.
I must confess it assumes that the reader knows what logical 'and' and
'or'
means, but someone who does not know that will probably not read the
docs.
(although, he will also not understand "not" either and maybe read the
docs...)
Maybe clarify that?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
