Christo Crause <christo.cra...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 11. Sep. 2019, 09:54:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:06 AM Ralf Quint <freedos...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 9/10/2019 4:26 PM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: >> > On 9/9/19 10:11 AM, James Richters wrote: >> >> Pascal doesn't have things like step... >> > >> > hunh??? i don't think that's right but i'm just catching up after >> > several 10+ hours days of $job... >> > >> > i know that i've written code in the past that did use something to >> > step X numbers per run through the look and it did not involved >> > manually incrementing the loop var... >> > >> > >> I am not aware of any Pascal implementation that does have a STEP >> parameter for FOR loops, and I am programming in Pascal at least as long >> as you... ;-) >> > > FPC documentation: > https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu58.html#x164-18600013.2.4 - > at least FPC doesn't allow specifying an increment size. Several other > languages do allow specifying an increment (nice list of for loop > constructs with specified increment in various languages: > https://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Loops/For_with_a_specified_step). Modula-2 > or Oberon-2 code snippets could perhaps be mistaken for Pascal through the > mists of time. > Well, we do have a patch for "for ... (down)to ... by" support: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25549 Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
